Overview
When we are conscious of our thoughts, we are aware of images—visual, verbal, tactile, and all the rest. Objects populate the world without; images populate the world within. Until very recently, imagery seemed like and utterly private event, something we could access only through introspection. Growing suspicion of introspection in the middle decades of the 20th century lead behaviorist, psychologist and philosophers, such as Ludwig Wittgenstein to thus claim that imagery could not be studied scientifically.
Today, we believe that the behaviorist and these philosophers were wrong. Not only have we developed behavioral techniques that allow us publicly to validate introspect ions by tracking the observable footprints of imagery, but also we now can use brain scanning to observe the neural levers and pistons that power imagery.
There is still, however, a great deal more to do. In particular, our understanding of the phenomenology of mental imagery – the scope of cognitive and emotional experiences that people can have of imagery – remains woefully underdeveloped. In contrast, over the centuries, Tibetan Buddhism has developed a system of disciplined introspective techniques for generating, controlling, and observing mental images that is probably unparalleled in the world. What can modern science learn from this rich and virtually untapped database of phenomenological observation? What can traditional Buddhism learn from us?
- Dialogue 114 sessions
- September 13, 2003Dharamsala, Himachal Pradesh, India